https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415541
--- Comment #23 from Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> --- (In reply to David Edmundson from comment #21) > @victor > > With regards to phabricator, what Albert was suggesting was to create a new > revision on phabricator in the same workflow as developers use for other > changes. > > That way we keep everything in the same workflow and we see the patch > in-line and can accept or request changes appropriately and track that. He unsubscribed from this bug as far as i can remember. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
