https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401512
Franco Pasquarelli <franco.pasquare...@unicatt.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |franco.pasquarelli@unicatt.
| |it
--- Comment #5 from Franco Pasquarelli <franco.pasquare...@unicatt.it> ---
Also the following diff solve the problem
diff --git a/scripting/python_scripter.cc b/scripting/python_scripter.cc
index 62a7409b..ada48861 100644
--- a/scripting/python_scripter.cc
+++ b/scripting/python_scripter.cc
@@ -527,13 +527,14 @@ ObjectImp* PythonScripter::calc( CompiledPythonScript&
script, const Args& args
handle<> argstuph( PyTuple_New( args.size() ) );
for ( int i = 0; i < (int) objectvect.size(); ++i )
{
+ Py_XINCREF((objectvect.begin() +i)->ptr());
PyTuple_SetItem( argstuph.get(), i, (objectvect.begin() +i)->ptr() );
};
+
+
tuple argstup( argstuph );
handle<> reth( PyEval_CallObject( calcfunc.ptr(), argstup.ptr() ) );
-// object resulto = calcfunc( argstup );
-// handle<> reth( PyEval_CallObject( calcfunc.ptr(), args ) );
object resulto( reth );
extract<ObjectImp&> result( resulto );
where I increase the reference count of the arguments
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
