https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414742
--- Comment #11 from Walther Pelser <w.pel...@web.de> --- Maybe my description was too short and not transparent enough. So I think, I caused this misunderstanding myself. But I think now, that there are 2 defects in this one description: First: The Symlink with a name that ends with ".123" should not be identified as a lotus-1-2-3 file. Second: If shared-mime-info would work correctly no one would ever had recognised the first defect. The .local mime setting would always override the default setting. But I wonder, why this does not happen. In this .local setting "*.123" files or symlinks are definitely excluded from being identified as a lotus-1-2-3 files. Should this be a separate bug? You have changed the status into confirmed, but "resolved as "fixed"" may become changed too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
