https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #23 from katearche...@yandex.ru --- (In reply to Raghavendra kamath from comment #20) > @ Kate the filter masks are designed to affect everything beneath them, when > you merge it , it creates a layer similar to what "new layer from visible" > does. perhaps you need filter masks and not filter layer. Well, yes and no. The workflow is kinda the same but since it's a nondestructive workflow I don't want to immediately merge results or to restrict myself to only one layer at the time. It's usually several layers created one after the other and some filter layers in between. At certain points in time I'm merging some of them since they were temporary anyway and pretty much ad-hoc. But I want to retain the ability to tweak them in that time that passes between their creation and the eventual merging. And most certainly I don't want to loose transparency in the process or have some unexpected pixels bleeding through. > > In the scenario of your latest attachement, can you show us images of what > is expected after the merge of two layers (marked in red). Should the filter > be only applied to layer 11 and merged, but then the remaining layer won't > have the filter applied to it. > > Can you show us the resulting merged layer in your ideal case. As in a > screenshot of what the resulting layer should look like would help. Yeah. sure thing. Here is the gallery with krita expected/actual results and I've asked a friend to make the same thing in photoshop so the results of that operation there as well: https://imgur.com/a/0GjXguZ In photoshop there were the same steps: create a filter layer(an adjustment layer in a adobe world), select two layers(an adjusment layer and a paint layer) and hit ctrl-e to merge them. Notice that the adjustments were transfered only to the layer that was merged with and no additional pixels were added to the result. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
