https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407998
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> --- > I find it strange that they do not do so for KDE Applications I suspect that it's partially a resourcing issue and partially because there's much less urgency compared to a web browser, which is the #1 attack vector on most computers. > Still, if a distro makes the choice of staying with an outdated version that > is not updated upstream, that should mean providing some sort of downstream > support. That's not really how it works. If distros choose to package old versions of our software, that doesn't (and shouldn't) create any kind of obligation on our part to provide patches. The IMO correct way to resolve this situation--if it needs resolving--would be to alter the KDE apps release model to have LTS releases like Plasma has. Then distros that insist on shipping old stuff can lock themselves into the LTS version of our apps and receive a steady stream of bugfixes, just like they do with Plasma. Then again, this wouldn't help you since the scaling chooser was a new feature, not a bugfix--so you'd need a newer major version anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
