https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378814
--- Comment #7 from Иван Туманов <tu4manj...@yandex.ru> --- (In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #1) > Hey Corentin, > > thanks for getting in touch! > > I think we're pretty much in the same boat but opposite > streams - we'd prefer to keep using the Qt daemon and Qt > libraries, rather. For us it's much easier to work with > and also fix bugs in a Qt codebase, which is our primary > language after all. > > I agree that the Canonical situation is a very unfortunate > one but given that the Qt daemon is working well for our > needs, I don't really see the need to switch techs. > > My understanding is that GSignond is not actually compatible > with the Signond, is that correct? If that's the case, I would > really wish that these two are brought together more closer, > to be compatible and interchangeable. Then we could both keep > our native daemons while having fully cross-desktop accounts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
