https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404465
arcli...@gmail.com <arcli...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |testcase
--- Comment #10 from arcli...@gmail.com <arcli...@gmail.com> ---
If your community code refuses to control the behaviour of the code author or
to uphold the status of the bug report under control of the report author
"until purposeful negotiation in respect of the reported bug has been achieved
between the code author and the report author" I challenge your authority to
censor the use of fields since otherwise you have allowed this bug to be
silenced without resolution!
This entire episode has been a demonstration of exclusive Hegemony towards a
valid and alternate point of view:
"Authored code must show a minimum standard of code investment viz to
demonstrate equality of the contextual systems that are not the property of the
code author so to minimize the potential for impact to the otherwise unknown
condition, status, business function and acutely the business schedule of the
contextual system before a new instance of the authors code is about to run
within, i.e. with a dialogue to ask the system owner for consent to run this
new instance (Y/N?)"
Carte blanche operations will no longer suffice in a mature OS environment
where negotiation skills must prioritize coherent equality with creative
output.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
