https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355190

--- Comment #16 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.ar...@mailcity.com> ---
Created attachment 98279
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98279&action=edit
KDE 3.5.10

(In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #15)
> The thing is that our manpower is limited and there are features like this
> one that we frankly did not consider as important as others.

Exactly. KDE developers code for _themselves_ and choose things to work on on
their own. Their userbase concerns are not their own cencerns.

If what I'm saying is not true, we wouldn't have had two major fuck ups called
KDE4 and KDE SC5. We wouldn't have had a situation when multiple applications
from the past have no equivalents in KDE5. We wouldn't have had a situation
when new KDE4/KDE SC5 application have far fewer features than their KDE3
counterparts.

> Also, I was actually looking into implementing this very feature recently but 
> Artem's
> comment really drove away my motivation for that...

You see, you just prove my words all the freaking time. You're busy coding new
shiny APIs no one cares about instead of making gradual changes while
preserving old features.

Who exactly uses KDE SC5 on smartphones, tablets or Windows? Who cares how
portable KDE is? People need to work for God's sake. You do _everything_ to
break people's workflow and then you suddenly realize that people have stopped
using your software. Run stats on KDE bugzilla and you'll suddenly realize
people's activity as of recently has substantially decreased even though
overall more people use Linux nowadays. Have you asked yourself why?

Do you realize that both KDE and Gnome have long stopped being the most popular
DEs in Linux? Do you know what's number one right now? XFCE4 running GTK2 is.
People are tired of your shit, sir. You do _not_ remove crucial features just
because you believe that new APIs are better than the old ones. People do not
care about APIs.

You do not remove xembed (systray) support and break dozens of apps, just
because you think everyone should upgrade from xembed. You do not remove
absolutely useful systray apps and replace them with UGLY unusable plasmoids
which you cannot embed into systray at all, because you present information
very sparsely.

Have a look at my task bar in KDE 3.5.10. Now tell me if I can do anything like
that in KDE5.

1) It's fully transparent (it has an option for that) - do not tell me about
unsupported KDE5 themes.
2) It has applications which don't have existing corresponding .desktop
shortcuts.
3) It has KNetStats which show network activity in real time by blinking.
4) It has a weather applet.
5) KSensors (including _voltages_, _fans_ speed and temperatures).

You tell me to upgrade to KDE5 to have my workflow royally fucked? What for?

Don't get me started on the fact that KDE4/KDE5 are absolute resource hogs in
comparison to KDE3 while _usually_ having less polish, working slower and
having uglier UI out of the box.

It's not users who drive you away.
It's you who drive users away.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to