https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400632
--- Comment #4 from Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> --- (In reply to Christoph Cullmann from comment #3) > exception safety is of no concern for us. * I find such information strange for C++ programmers. * I assume that involved parties would care more for involved software development concerns under specific circumstances. > If any of the standard functions throws (like e.g. new), we can't recover > anyways and the standard handler will abort (or we will crash). Can it become more interesting to let some destructors perform useful work at the end? > in GlobalState looks like such a case. Thanks that you can follow my development view to some degree here. > On the other side, I am not sure why this things are not just in-place > members, > which would avoid the heap-allocation. Would you like to reduce dynamic memory allocation instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
