https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397340

Eric <pub08-...@davor.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pub08-...@davor.org

--- Comment #11 from Eric <pub08-...@davor.org> ---
How about this:
  - If digiKam modifies either the main file or the sidecar, update the
    database's timestamp column to match

  - If another program modifies *either* of those files, digiKam should
    reread the image and update the database timestamp

That is, ISTM that the timestamp column is trying to indicate when the
conceptual "image" entity last changed -- more specifically, when its discrete,
out-of-database representation changed.  Supposing that's correct, whether the
representation consists of one file or two is beside the point.

(Then again, I don't know what other uses digiKam makes of that column, and
whether any of those would conflict with this idea.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to