https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338252
--- Comment #27 from Philippe Waroquiers <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #26) > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84934#c1 suggests that > distributions are supposed to install the LTO-plugin on the right place. Do > the distrubutuions you care about do so and if not, why? I have no idea, but the gcc doc says to use gcc-ar. On at least some platforms, it was failing with ar, and succesful when using gcc-ar (according to the gcc user manual). If a gcc+distribution works with ar, it will also work with gcc-ar. So, I see no reason to use ar instead of gcc-ar, as this can only make lto fail on some setup, without repairing any other setup. However, as I understand, llvm is important for you, and when compiling with llvm, llvm-ar must be used. So, when I have a little bit of time, I will install llvm and see if I can make that work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
