https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379170
--- Comment #14 from torbj...@stabo.se --- Den 2017-09-06 kl. 23:29, skrev Christoph Feck: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379170 > > --- Comment #13 from Christoph Feck <cf...@kde.org> --- > torbjorn, what does "ls -l" show for the size of the folders? Empty > directories > indeed need disk space. > (The folders I used for testing before were empty, as in no files in them) Technically they do, no arguing there. But I'd expect next to everyone to expect the reported size to be for the folder *contents*, not the number of bytes/blocks used in total for the folder structures on disk. Like I said before, the way it is now the returned value/functionality is unusable when looking for empty - as in folders with no files, or at the most files with no contents - folders. /Regards, Torbjörn Stabo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
