https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525421
--- Comment #2 from James <[email protected]> --- I will not encounter in future. The function is so useless that I have deleted the software. If you're happy to say "all good" simply because I didn't do your job for you, that may explain why it's so bad. Your choice On Wed, 9 Sept 2026, 3:43 pm , <[email protected]> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525421 > > [email protected] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO > Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED > CC| |[email protected] > > --- Comment #1 from [email protected] --- > Thank you for taking the time to report your experience with the > auto-tagging > feature in digiKam. > > We appreciate feedback, as it helps us improve the software. However, we > kindly > ask all users to adhere to KDE’s Code of Conduct, which emphasizes respect, > collaboration, and constructive communication. Unfortunately, the tone and > language used in this report do not align with these values. > > Since no further actionable details (e.g., specific examples, version > information, or suggestions) have been provided to investigate or address > the > issue, we will close this report. If you encounter similar issues in the > future > and would like to contribute to improving digiKam, we encourage you to: > - Provide clear, reproducible steps. > - Share specific examples (e.g., images and incorrect tags). > - Use respectful and constructive language. > > We are always open to well-intentioned feedback and are happy to reopen the > discussion if new, actionable information is provided. > > Thank you for your understanding. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
