https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509686
--- Comment #2 from Massimiliano L <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Gustavo Mitamura from comment #1) > Thank you for your bug report! > I'm afraid Okular 25.08.0 no longer receives updates or maintenance from > KDE; active versions are 26.04.3 or newer. Please upgrade to an active > version as soon as your distribution makes it available to you, or use other > application distribution methods such as Flathub. KDE applications can be > fast-moving, and bugs in one version are often fixed in the next one. > If you need help with Okular 26.04.3, please contact your distribution, who > bears the responsibility of providing help for older releases that are no > longer receiving updates from KDE. > If you can reproduce the issue after upgrading to an active version, feel > free to re-open this bug report. > Thanks for understanding! Dear Gustavo, thank you for the answer. My understanding of the KDE Bugzilla policies is that "version" is not the "last version on which the bug is observed" but, as the label now says, "version first reported in". The field is not supposed to be updated and as bugs get older, it is therefore expected for "version" to match an unsupported version of the software. Likewise, I believe that "RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED" should be used to resolve bugs originally filed against unmaintained software versions and not bugs filed against a version that has later become unmaintained. What I normally experience on the KDE Bugzilla is that a maintainer stops by, asks whether the bug is still reproducible and only after user's feedback (or lack of response within a reasonable timeframe) the bug is closed. So I would like to understand whether Okular follows a different policy and whether it is encouraged to update the "version" field every time we experience the bug on a newer version (it does not seem sensible to open a new bug every time?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
