https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376074
--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Scheffner <wscheffn...@gmail.com> --- Maik, >On the other hand, Marble has his own bookmark management. >This allows you to set bookmarks via the context menu in digiKam >and are also displayed in Marble. I tested this, created a bookmark in digiKam and then took a look into Marble. Indeed!!! The bookmark was there - but all my others were gone!!!! Wonderful function! Seems first thing to do for me is to put a warning in the doc. >I vote for implementing the bookmark management without KBookmarks. and Gilles: >yes, me too Well, at least Marble has a bookmark management and digiKam not. And without that the whole thing is useless IMHO. >It's perhaps time to check the new implementation. Very good idea I would think under this circumstances. Could save us a lot of work if they did something good. At least the bookmark management is not too bad. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
