https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499170
--- Comment #6 from korwin <korwin+kde....@proton.me> --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #5) Last month I tried using digiKam for the first time for two weeks and was amazed by the richness of its capabilities and how unoptimized it was. According to the logs, the application processes image metadata at a speed of ~20 pcs/second, which in the case of large collections (more than half a million files) turns into 30-40 hours of waiting for each mass operation. And this is in a situation where the application interface is often completely blocked for many hours due to background processes, the execution of which is not displayed anywhere, as well as their ETA. For this reason, I refused to use this application. But if you say that the new version of the application has significantly improved performance, I will install it again, this time I will choose MySQL instead of SQLite, wait a few days until the end of indexing, check if there are any differences, and write here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
