https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501365
--- Comment #10 from Paul Floyd <pjfl...@wanadoo.fr> --- (In reply to mcermak from comment #9) > > Yes please, this code is simple enough > > Mark, is it really only about "hooking" the existing PRE() and POST() up? > I've noticed that for instance i386 passes sycall params via stack (as > opposed to amd64 where this gets passed via regs). The existing PRE() > relies on register parameter passing. Not sure about other arches. > Thoughts? Marshalling syscall args to/from registers/stack from/to the syscall is handled elsewhere. The only issue the sometimes arises is the case where a 32bit OS syscall has a 64bit argument. In that case a separate syscall wrapper is needed because the 64bit arguemnt will get split into two 32 bit ones. As an example take a look at fallocate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
