https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499383
--- Comment #40 from elbawkbawk <weberz...@gmail.com> --- But that's the tool they use, and it keeps the conversation out of the end user threads. And how people manage oss without a registered key is beyond me. But the important part is to keep the dev bickering amongst the devs and not in the user space. So if your going to develop, then please, use their toolset and develop. This is the wrong spot for your conversation. As a user, I appreciate anyone's contributions of time and skill. To both, I thank you for your service. It's so very appreciated as a daily user. On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, 1:17 PM <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499383 > > --- Comment #39 from yuraposta...@proton.me --- > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #37) > > (In reply to François Guerraz from comment #36) > > > FWIW my patch works fine for me, so I’m okay, but it’s not a platform > I want > > > to invest time in learning in any more depth. > > > > I'm not sure how you want feedback to your patch, but given there exists > > systems like gerrit to enable others to actually work with you on fixing > > your patch, which I as an absolute wayland noob can tell is at least far > too > > big and is filling me with more 'why he changes this?' rather than 'this > > makes sense'. > https://wiki.qt.io/Setting_up_Gerrit > Qt's Gerrit seems complicated to set up. Github, gitlab or even > bugs.kde.org > would never ask you to mess with your PC's SSH keys and sign weird license > agreements. It's too much for a casual contributor. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
