https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500728
--- Comment #4 from Max Buchholz <max.buchh...@gmx.de> --- > (In reply to Nicolas Fella from comment #2) > > I'd see the main value of kpublictransport in the data about providers, not > > necessarily the implementation to talk to them For me it's actually exactly that: Instead of rewriting the logic to talk to different kinds of providers again in python, I would rather prefer to use kpublictransport. Of course if it is harder to maintain the bindings, compared to a separate implementation, this doesn't work out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
