https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REPORTED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> ---
(In reply to cvinhaes from comment #3)
>
> Thank you for your quick response. If you mean with DigiKam, I have tested
> with YOLO Nano v5 and ResNet50. If you mean to what I am comparing Digikam
> to, that is Photoprism,which adopts NASNet Mobile 224 , I think. Photoprism
> is way more conservative but yeld more reliable results overall. Both
> aplications are connected to the same set of photos.
I want to let you know I haven't forgotten about this ticket. I'm rewriting
the auto-tagging pipelines now.
I've tested several models including multiple versions of NasNet, and it seems
YOLO v11 is the most accurate. It will probably be a few more weeks until the
new code and models are merged into the daily builds. There will be an update
to this bug entry when the new code is available if you'd like to test.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
