https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> --- (In reply to Chris D from comment #12) > I have been using 8.5 for a couplea weeks, and it is MUCH improved, so > thanks to everyone for the hard work. Many more faces in my collection have > been identified, although still odd non-face results and such. Hopefully > it's downhill from here! > > But I wonder, has the subject of this thread been addressed yet? Does this > update make the rejection of wrong identifications helpful or meaningful? > Or should we just continue to ignore wrong suggestions? > > Thanks! > Chris Hi Chris, digiKam does not keep track of rejected face matches, and the same face will appear in the next recognition pass. The best way to avoid this is to either "ignore" the face, or confirm the face with a new name. Future recognition passes will either ignore the face, or match the face to the new confirmed name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
