https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495817
--- Comment #10 from Florian Krohm <flo2...@eich-krohm.de> --- (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #9) > (In reply to Florian Krohm from comment #8) > HWCAP doesn't list all of the architecture's facilities. My list came from /proc/cpuinfo and I'm pretty sure it shows facilities that do not require kernel support. ldisp comes to mind. But, hey, why should it list all available facilities. That would be too easy. </sarcasm> tests/s390x-features to the rescue. Yes, you're right. My machine does have the fpext facility. And I do get a SIGILL for NNPA, as the corresponding facility is not installed here. So what you describe is correct. Now, sarcasm is rarely constructive. So let me suggest a --list option to s390x-features which lists all facilities (relevant to valgrind) and whether they are supported on the host. As for EmFail vs SIGILL I'd say we stick with the current scheme of using EmFail particularly as we cannot even generate a SIGILL. Generating SIGILL is definitely plan on record as we want to do that for specification exceptions. We can revisit this issue at that time. What do you think. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
