https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492040
Olivier Croquette <oliv...@croquette.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oliv...@croquette.de
--- Comment #24 from Olivier Croquette <oliv...@croquette.de> ---
I have the same issue on Manjaro:
> /etc/arch-release:Manjaro Linux
> /etc/lsb-release:DISTRIB_ID="ManjaroLinux"
> /etc/lsb-release:DISTRIB_RELEASE="24.1.2"
> /etc/lsb-release:DISTRIB_CODENAME="Xahea"
> /etc/lsb-release:DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Manjaro Linux"
> /etc/manjaro-release:Manjaro Linux
> /etc/os-release:NAME="Manjaro Linux"
> /etc/os-release:PRETTY_NAME="Manjaro Linux"
> /etc/os-release:ID=manjaro
> /etc/os-release:ID_LIKE=arch
> /etc/os-release:BUILD_ID=rolling
> /etc/os-release:ANSI_COLOR="32;1;24;144;200"
> /etc/os-release:HOME_URL="https://manjaro.org/";
> /etc/os-release:DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://wiki.manjaro.org/";
> /etc/os-release:SUPPORT_URL="https://forum.manjaro.org/";
> /etc/os-release:BUG_REPORT_URL="https://docs.manjaro.org/reporting-bugs/";
> /etc/os-release:PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://manjaro.org/privacy-policy/";
> /etc/os-release:LOGO=manjarolinux
I use DK 8.5, but the current conditions of the development version do not
match either:
> if [[ ! (($OS_NAME == "ubuntu" && $OS_VERSION -ge 2010) ||
> ($OS_NAME == "manjarolinux" && $OS_VERSION -ge 247) ||
> ($OS_NAME == "fedora linux" && $OS_VERSION -ge 40) ||
> ($OS_NAME == "opensuse tumbleweed" && $OS_VERSION -ge 20240908)) ]]
> ; then
My version is lower than 247, but I wonder if the check makes sense at all for
a rolling distribution. Wouldn't it be better to allow preload_shared_library
to fail for libgnutls.so.30, instead of having it mandatory depending on these
conditions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
