I’ll also comment that many software suites don’t scale to 10’s or 100’s of 
million of paths

Keep in mind paths != routes and many folks don’t always catch the difference 
between them.  If you have a global network like 2914 (for example) you may be 
peering with someone in 10-20 places globally so if they send you 10k routes, * 
20 locations that’s 200k paths(exits), then move to someone with 100k or 400k 
prefixes like 3356 had at one point, those numbers go up quite a bit.

- Jared

> On Dec 8, 2023, at 12:16 PM, Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I tried to advocate for both, sorry if I was unclear.
> 
> ORR for good options, add-path for redundancy and/or ECMPability.
> 
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 19:13, Thomas Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Why not both add-path + ORR?
>> --
>> 
>> Thomas Scott
>> Sr. Network Engineer
>> +1-480-241-7422
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 11:57 AM Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:42, Vincent Bernat via juniper-nsp
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2023-12-07 15:21, Michael Hare via juniper-nsp wrote:
>>>>> I recognize Saku's recommendation of rib sharding is a practical one at 
>>>>> 20M routes, I'm curious if anyone is willing to admit to using it in 
>>>>> production and on what version of JunOS.  I admit to have not played with 
>>>>> this in the lab yet, we are much smaller [3.5M RIB] worst case at this 
>>>>> point.
>>>> 
>>>> About the scale, I said routes, but they are paths. We plan to use add
>>>> path to ensure optimal routing (ORR could be another option, but it is
>>>> less common).
>>> 
>>> Given a sufficient count of path options, they're not really
>>> alternatives, but you need both. Like you can't do add-path <max>, as
>>> the clients won't scale. And you probably don't want only ORR, because
>>> of the convergence cost of clients not having a backup option or the
>>> lack of ECMP opportunity.
>>> 
>>> --
>>>  ++ytti
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to