Hi, I will have a look at it !
Nicolas On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 08:31, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) < jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > > > It seems that loosing spatial index of GeoPackage tables is a side effect > of this changeset that was otherwise a nice improvement > https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5976/ > > > > -Jukka- > > > > *Lähettäjä:* Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> > *Lähetetty:* keskiviikko 12. helmikuuta 2020 0.14 > *Vastaanottaja:* jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > *Aihe:* [JPP-Devel] Deprecation with GeoPackage and spatial index > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that there has happened some deprecation with GeoPackages since > released OpenJUMP 1.12. Version 1.12 detects and utilizes the spatial index > of a table which makes it very fast to use even huge tables if map is > zoomed close enough. New snapshots do not utilize spatial index which > makes OJ very slow with large tables. I have not yet analyzed more closely > when this change has happened. It seems that the layer list is sorted > differently now than in 1.12. Perhaps that change is related. > > > > I believe that the detection is done here > https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/core/trunk/src/com/vividsolutions/jump/datastore/spatialite/SpatialiteDSMetadata.java#l151 > . > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- >
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
