maybe i'm going to to try setup an automated git mirror, just to enable willing contributors to provide patches against. will have to find out how beforehand though.
wrt. the platform i don't really care if it's completely FOSS or not as as it provides the service to keep our FOSS project up and running. ..ede On 17.06.2019 08:03, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Me too. I also have no time for code migration too > > 2019-06-16 23:27 GMT+02:00, Michaël Michaud <m.michael.mich...@orange.fr>: >> Hi, >> >> I'am on the same line as you, Ede. I don't think I can find time for a >> code migration. >> >> Michaël >> >> Le 16/06/2019 à 15:53, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit : >>> hey Rashad, Brian, >>> >>> currently there are no active relocation efforts ongoing. while not >>> completely happy we are still using sf.net's svn and it is working out >>> most of the time. >>> >>> being very few devs we preferred spending our valuable time on the project >>> rather than on learning a new revision system. but as you bring it up now >>> - how is the current consensus of the team, looking at Peppe and Mike >>> here? >>> >>> ..ede >>> >>> On 14.06.2019 18:02, Brian M Hamlin wrote: >>>> Dear OpenJUMP Dev Team, all -- >>>> >>>> At OSGeo dot org, we run a Git interface that is FOSS and >>>> de-centralized, called gitea. OSGeo hosts this service at the Oregon >>>> State University Open Source Labs, >>>> with redundancy of hardware and routine backups. >>>> If you, like me, are concerned about mono-culture in Internet >>>> Services, USA-based companies >>>> control of critical infrastructure, asymmetric power relationships >>>> between FOSS developers and >>>> profit-oriented managers of hosts with no transparency, un-announced and >>>> hidden reporting >>>> on the acitivity of masses of otherwise independent people and companies, >>>> and other >>>> unintended consequences of over-centralized software activity, please >>>> listen. >>>> You might find that OSGeo dot org's gitea, fully transparent in code >>>> and operations, aligned with FOSS values and independent, with improving >>>> features like >>>> PR comments and users-groups features.. might be an excellent choice for >>>> your project >>>> if you want the github-style workflow. >>>> please contact SAC at OSGeo for more information >>>> thank you for your excellent (and fun) OpenJUMP Porject >>>> >>>> best regards from Berkeley, California >>>> -Brian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:38:18 0200, Rashad Kanavath >>>> <mohammedrasha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> Is there any update on this thread? anyone still working on migration to >>>> github? >>>> >>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/mailman/message/30246871/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
