On 03.04.2018 14:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > It sounds like a lot of job for OpenJUMP.
it will be, for us as well as for all the other jts implementing projects. it would be really interesting, if there is a kind of - we will stick to the old, it's stable enough - attitude out there. > What about to write to LocationTech and show the difficulties for such > changes? Is Martin Davis still involved into the JTS project? the main problem isn't the adaptation, that's mainly replacing package names in imports and changing some moved classes or API incompatibilities. the problem for us, apart from a man power that is virtually not existing for non essential tasks is: we have third party extensions, partly without the sources at hand. all these have to be adapted, compiled, zipped in a jar, just because jts decided it was change the package name, without any major incompatibility in the API itself. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
