hey Mike, On 3/11/2018 8:21, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Jumpers, > > One of the next big step will be to migrate to jts 1.15
let's do those as usual in trunk >and java 1.8. same here, currently i see no incompatibilities. what changes do you propose exactly? > > Migrating to jts 1.15 will probably break a lot of plugins. How do you think > we should manage this migration ? preferably with a compatibility layer, eg. two classloaders, one w/ old, one new jts. or standin JTS classes in OJ core, that fix incompatibilities on a one by one basis. > > I think we can start this migration on the trunk, and if something need o be > fixed on OpenJUMP 1.12, fix it on 1.12 tag. yeah, no ;). tags are immutable. > > Or should we make another branch for important fixes on 1.12 ? we would actually need a branch for this, which i don't like because of the management overhead. let's talk about it some more, before we settle on a decision. main points for me are - what possibly breaks w/ new JTS (Mike?) - are there drawbacks to declare OJ Core java8+ compatible instantly (i see none) ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
