Hi Michaël

>Do you intend to upgrade Sextante version before 1.10 release or is it too
much
work if we plan to release next month ?

Yes. It is possible. But there are still some issues.
For instance I discovered this evening that new modeler/toolbox cannot load
old Sextante models (while old modeler/toolbox can load new Sextante
models).
There must be some incompatibilities even if apparently the files .models
seems to be the same (opened with a notepad).
I will give a look tomorrow. I will anyhow add sourcecodes on this weekend
to OJ svn
Peppe


2016-11-18 9:10 GMT+01:00 Michaël Michaud <m.michael.mich...@orange.fr>:

> Hi Peppe,
>
> Good work. I hope I'll have the time to have a look this week-end.
> Do you intend to upgrade Sextante version before 1.10 release or is it too
> much
> work if we plan to release next month ?.
>
> Michaël
>
> Le 17/11/2016 à 15:44, Giuseppe Aruta a écrit :
>
> Hi Michael, Jukka and others
> Just an upgrade of what I have done (and I am going to do) during these
> days with sextante + a newer prototipe of Sextante
> I am going to upgrade Sextante on this weekend using a newer version (2014
> vs OJ 2010) that I downloaded and recopiled from GvSIG CE repository.
> this newer upgrade will be:
> a) newer Sextante libraries (Sextante.jar, Sextante_gui.jar and
> Sextante_math.jar)
> b) the older Sextante_algorithms.jar and a new group of algorithms that I
> left on a separate jar file (Sextante_algorithms_new.jar) in order to not
> to confuse with the previous (I didn't test all, and they could be not
> working)
> c) the corresponding libraries for a) and b)
> d) a newer OJSextante binding
>
> a), b) and c) will be on a newer OJ night build
>
> I will also put all the *souce codes* of a), b) (and corresponding
> libraies) and c)  in OJ repository, probably as resource URL
> http://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/plug-ins/SextantePlugIn2 (we
> already have a http://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/plug-ins/
> SextantePlugin with only a) with libraries)
>
> >Maybe we could even put them into an own group in the Sextante menu
> because now they are scattered into point, line, polygon, and vector tool
> categories. SomeMaybe we could even put them into an own group in the
> Sextante menu because now they are scattered into point, line, polygon, and
> vector tool categories. Some “OpenJUMP favorites” group at the top of the
> menu might be good for the users group at the top of the menu might be
> good for the users
>
> It looks easy to implemet: the only matter is to deside what is “OpenJUMP
> favorites”.
>
>
> >I think that a few of the Sextante tools could also have a native
> OpenJUMP tool to be included in the core and I have marked some candidates
> with “+OJ?”
>
> It would be also possible to do also the opposite: to lunch OJ native
> plugins from Sextante Toolbar (GvSIG CE and GVSIG official implemented this
> functionality).
>
>
> There are still some issues  which are not solved (for istance, if I load
> a file with polygons/points and linestrings, Sextante toolbox shows only
> Polygon algorithms as active one). This issue affects also GvSIG. A work
> around was to add a filter (to not load mixed gemetries layers into
> sextante) to avoid user's confusion.
>
> I attached a link to dropbox where you can download a prototipe of this
> newer Sextante
> :https://www.dropbox.com/s/1r4g1cievhcxbjx/OJ_sextante2.zip?dl=0
>
> On a newer OJ NB
> a) Erase ojsextante_bindingXX.jar
> b) Erase all files into lib/ext/sextante folder
> c) Copy  oj_sextante_binding.jar from OJ_sextante2.zip  file into lib/ext
> folder
> d) Copy all files from OJ_sextante2.zip/Sextante folder to
> lib/ext/sextante folder
>
> @Michael: I finelly was able to let the help framework to works fine.
>
> Stay in touch
>
> Peppe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-11-17 9:09 GMT+01:00 Michaël Michaud <m.michael.mich...@orange.fr>:
>
>> Hi Jukka,
>>
>> Interesting, thanks for this. Just a few remarks before I have a deeper
>> look on this list :
>>
>> Check line direction coherence (+OJ?)
>>
>> Directional mean
>>
>> Fill elevation values
>>
>> Geometric properties of lines
>>
>> Join adjacent lines (+OJ?)
>>
>> Smooth lines (+OJ?) : a plugin already exists, I'll include it in
>> Generalization menu (and/or geometry functions)
>>
>> Constrained Delaunay triangulation : what about  Tools > Generate >
>> Triangulation ?
>>
>> Distance to closest geometry
>>
>> Mean center and standard distance
>>
>> Median center
>>
>> Nearest neighbor analysis
>>
>> Perturbate points layer
>>
>> Quadrant analysis
>>
>> Ripley K
>>
>> Snap points to layer (+OJ?)
>>
>> Spatial autocorrelation
>>
>> Spatial cluster
>>
>> Adjust n point to polygon (+OJ?)
>>
>> Geometric properties of polygons
>>
>> Medial axis : did you try the new skeletonizer in the Graph extension
>> (not exactly medial axis though) ?
>>
>> Resolve polygon holes (+OJ?)
>>
>> Clean vector layer
>>
>> Correlation between fields
>>
>> Create equivalent numerical class
>>
>> Distances and angles
>>
>> Filter vector layer
>>
>> Histogram
>>
>> Minimum enclosing shapes
>>
>> Normality test
>> Spatial Join (nearest neighbour)
>>
>> Michaël
>>
>>
>> Le 17/11/2016 à 08:52, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I tried to make a list of Sextante vector tools which do not have an
>> equivalent pair in OpenJUMP. Most of them are made for such analysis or
>> statistics which do not belong to the core of OpenJUMP and it would
>> probably make no sense to rewrite them into OpenJUMP. We should just test
>> that they really work and improve the documentation about how to use the
>> Sextante tools from OpenJUMP.  Maybe we could even put them into an own
>> group in the Sextante menu because now they are scattered into point, line,
>> polygon, and vector tool categories. Some “OpenJUMP favorites” group at the
>> top of the menu might be good for the users.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think that a few of the Sextante tools could also have a native
>> OpenJUMP tool to be included in the core and I have marked some candidates
>> with “+OJ?”. Some of them we may already have, like “resolve polygon holes”
>> vs. difference, but it is still worth comparing the implementations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Check line direction coherence (+OJ?)
>>
>> Directional mean
>>
>> Fill elevation values
>>
>> Geometric properties of lines
>>
>> Join adjacent lines (+OJ?)
>>
>> Smooth lines (+OJ?)
>>
>> Constrained Delaunay triangulation
>>
>> Distance to closest geometry
>>
>> Mean center and standard distance
>>
>> Median center
>>
>> Nearest neighbor analysis
>>
>> Perturbate points layer
>>
>> Quadrant analysis
>>
>> Ripley K
>>
>> Snap points to layer (+OJ?)
>>
>> Spatial autocorrelation
>>
>> Spatial cluster
>>
>> Adjust n point to polygon (+OJ?)
>>
>> Geometric properties of polygons
>>
>> Medial axis
>>
>> Resolve polygon holes (+OJ?)
>>
>> Clean vector layer
>>
>> Correlation between fields
>>
>> Create equivalent numerical class
>>
>> Distances and angles
>>
>> Filter vector layer
>>
>> Histogram
>>
>> Minimum enclosing shapes
>>
>> Normality test
>>
>> Spatial Join (nearest neighbour)
>>
>>
>>
>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing 
>> listJump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing
>> list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing 
> listJump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to