from http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html " A GeoJSON object with the type "Feature" is a feature object.
A feature object must have a member with the name "geometry". The value of the geometry member is a geometry object as defined above or a JSON null value. A feature object must have a member with the name "properties". The value of the properties member is an object (any JSON object or a JSON null value). " so that means "properties": null which validates on http://geojsonlint.com/ will fix it, did you came across a parser that did not like OJ generated GeoJSON because of that? ..ede On 15.11.2016 09:57, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > In GeoJSON FeatureCollection must have "properties" member even if there are > no attributes. This output from OpenJUMP r5186 does not validate > > { > "type": "FeatureCollection", > > "features": [ > { "type": "Feature", "geometry": > {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[278,423],[483,505],[478,293],[278,423]]],"crs":{"type":"name","properties":{"name":"EPSG:0"}}} > } > ] > > } > > I am not sure if this is the right fix but at least it validates: > { "type": "Feature", "properties": { }, "geometry": > > It seems that GeoJSONLint http://geojsonlint.com/ does not like the crs > member any more because it belongs to older, year 2008 version of GeoJSON. > However, I think that OpenJUMP should still output the old version that > supports projections. I try to find some more flexible validator. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
