Hi everyone!
@Jukka
Statistics inside the GeoTIFF, as a TAG: I hadn't considered that, but
it shouldn't be a problem reading them. I found some documentation in
this page
<http://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/tifftags/gdal_metadata.html>,
is it correct if I assume that other items (such as min value, max
value...) are just stored as other elements using the same keys used in
the aux.xml file , e.g.:
...
<Item name="STATISTICS_MAXIMUM">2775</Item>
<Item name="STATISTICS_MINIMUM">540.4</Item>
...
@Ede
My SF account name is bertazza, and yes, testing and debugging here is
paramount, the number of classes/methods where we put our hands is
worrying...
@Giuseppe
Thank you for letting me know what you have been working on. And I'll
try to avoid duplicates in terms of classes related to raster metadata.
We added the two RasterStyle and Legend classes to try to consolidate
symbology management. We also implemented a plugin called Raster Styles.
In the OJ build that I gave you for testing, the plugin is available via
the raster context menu: right click on the raster name in the layer
panel, and select "Raster Styles". You should be able to change raster
symbology: interval, ramps and single values are available. The plugin
is not complete nor optimized yet, but you can have a feel of what we're
trying to do.
Ubuntu problem: on windows 8 I could open your TIF file without
problems, I see it as nice B/W orthophoto. I wonder what could be
different in Linux. Do you have any idea about where the origin of the
problem could be, maybe JAI?
I will check the problem with "Extract part of image", thank you for
telling me.
Alberto
On 09/01/2015 10:41 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
On 09.01.2015 10:09, Alberto De Luca - GeA wrote:
Jukka,
- raster readers: I agree that tidying up a bit would be good, but
honestly I'd need to check them all before recommending anything;
no haste there, let's integrate your changes and we'll clean up after
SNIP
- With regards to the timing to contribute the changes to OJ, unless big
bugs are found or substantial new features are required, they shouldn't
take long. Since we've worked on the source code from OJ 1.7.1-r4004,
we'd need to check if everything is ok with the most recent source code,
but I don't see it as a lengthy operation.
to make it available to a broader test user group i'd like to have it committed
soon, so users can stumble over problems when using the snapshots ;)
what is your sf.net account name?
..ede
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
