On 02.05.2014 16:32, Michael Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, >>> OK, done. >>> I also removed previous the former jts version from pom to have a single >>> JTS jar in the distribution. >>> Let's check the snaphots now... >> probably a _bad idea_.. the dependency in pom is necessary to build OJ! >> >> all we do is build against the old, but package the new ;) .. there is a >> possibility to also build against the lib/*.jar but that's not needed as we >> just temporarily package your jts snapshot > OK, I see. Build and Package phases are not as related as I thought. > I revert my change in pom.xml. > Building with a jar and packaging with another is probably not a good > practice though :-( > Any better idea ? >
nope, it's a workaround anyway ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
