On 14.04.2012 14:31, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi, >> actually i think laf should have been persistent already and see it >> more as a bugfix, together with the proper theming of the options >> dialog now. but it's no urgent matter, so it can wait if you want it to. > Just wondered if it could create compatibility issues. > For example, I think that database connections are also defined in > workbench-state.xml and people might want to keep it when they upgrade. > Will the new openjump be able to read an old workbench-state.xml ? > > If answer is yes, I don't mind you add it in 1.5.2. >
of course. just open the workbench-state.xml and you'll see it's just a bunch of xml entities. lafs are a new entry containing the laf classname. if there is a laf stored that does not exist in the current jvm it is simply ignored and the system default laf stays active. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
