Jukka,

Thanks for the PDF. I didn't know about the image manager tool. I'm
going to see if I can make time to find out more.

Landon

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
<jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make the document a bit better before putting it into wiki. 
> But if it goes as it tends to go, there probably will not be any extra time 
> for fixing it and after some lag period I will let it go as it is.
>
> When our governments will supply us with masses of fine raster maps and 
> aerial/satellite images the image index layer will be very valuable. OpenJUMP 
> can handle at least 50 image files in ECW or JPEG2000 format in one virtual 
> layer even without scale limits.
>
> I was hoping that a dedicated file name extension would help OpenJUMP to 
> understand that it should not show the JUMP GML file as vectors. Sometimes it 
> might still be good to be able to edit it as a normal vector layer. For sure 
> there will be cases when the drive letter of USB-drive changes and index file 
> would come useless, or images are moved to new locations for some other 
> reason. But perhaps it could be handled better by adding a new Open Image 
> Index entry into Open File dialogue.
>
>
> -Jukka-
>
>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>> Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [mailto:michael.mich...@free.fr]
>> Lähetetty: 29. helmikuuta 2012 14:44
>> Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
>> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] Improving and renaming the Image Layer
>> Manager tool
>>
>> Hi Jukka,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing your knowledge and ideas about this tool.
>>
>> I think your document could be put in the wiki (just see that
>> entry for
>> this tool is actually missing in
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/jump-pilot/index.php?ti
> tle=Layer_Menu)
>>
>> You can create a  link from this wiki page to a new page entirely
>> dedicated to this tool.
>> If you prefer, I can also upload your doc to sourceforge files
>> documentation section
>> (in this case, it would be useful to have your name and a date in the
>> document I think)
>>
>> I have not a clear idea about how your proposal would improve
>> OpenJUMP
>> as I don't
>> use images very often (and will have no much time for that in a near
>> future).
>> By the way,  I'm curious about what problem creating another file
>> extension for images
>> index files would solve.
>> Just as a side note, I think that internally, image layer
>> management is
>> the same as
>> vector's in that rendering pipeline displays in-memory features which
>> envelope
>> intersects the viewport.
>> Difference is in the "style", which is in charge of the image
>> display in
>> the case of a
>> image layer. In this case disk accesses to read images are only
>> performed for images
>> to be displayed.
>>
>> Michaël
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I wrote a short document about the OpenJUMP Image Layer
>> Manager tool. I have a feeling that it is not much used so I
>> took a bunch of screen captures for showing what is does and
>> how it is used. In the end of the document there are a few
>> suggestions for making this fine tool better.  In few words I
>> recommend to rename the tool to something that describes the
>> tool better, like Image Index Manager, and to make it
>> possible to save and open OJ image index files more
>> conveniently than now.
>> >
>> > http://latuviitta.org/documents/OpenJUMP_image_layer_tool.pdf
>> >
>> > I have a slight feeling that OpenJUMP could sometimes
>> benefit also from analogous vector file index system. For
>> example, we have a dataset that contains thousands of
>> shapefiles, each one covering a 10 by 10 kilometer rectangle.
>>  With a vector index file and properly set layer scale limits
>> OpenJUMP might be able to handle the whole dataset as a one
>> seamless layer even it is a few gigabytes all together. I
>> guess it would be much easier to make it work as read-only
>> than to make is support also editing.
>> >
>> > -Jukka Rahkonen-
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> > Virtualization&  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
>> > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
>> > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
>> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
>> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
>> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to