On 07.01.2012 10:01, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, Stefan, > > Some notes and questions about packaging/releasing > > I'm comparing the ant build with the NB maven results and noticed some > differences : > > *ant build* > - includes all jar and dll of plus distribution > * I will make a core distribution by hand and update the build to have > choice between core and plus > * I think I just have to exclude batik.jar and PLUS dir for core distro
sounds reasonable. for the sake of administration we should maybe decide to use either ant or maven? in the future? > - manifest includes all jars (should include only core jar) don't use ant, dunno about it > *maven build (core nb)* > - includes junit.jar which is probably useless for core you can remove it if you are sure. comment it out in pom.xml. we'll see if something breaks in the snapshots ;) > - manifest is empty (cannot start OJ from jar) removed it because oj has to be started with the scripts anyway to be useful > Question : for your daily developments, do you use and > test OpenJUMP after a compilation made from ant, from mvn or another way ? i run and debug with eclipse run configurations. for quick checks of fixed or changed functionality by others i use the snapshots. especially on machines where eclispse is not set up. > > *Different jar versions :* > never changed any of that sorry.. ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
