Hi, > I'd rather propose to keep the OpenJUMP vs. oj_<osname> scheme. > > As I see it OpenJUMP launchers are convenience launchers and are not highly > configurable, although it is possible to do so in the windows launcher's case. > The scripts are the configurable, advanced user pendants. > This would keep the necessary documentation effort in check, only the scripts > have to be explained. Makes sense to me.
Michaël > ..ede > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
