Thanks for the feedback Jukka. I definitely need to look into the
problem you report about the measure tool not taking the current snap
settings into account.

This sounds like a bug to me. What do you guys think? Should we file a
bug report?

The Sunburned Surveyor

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
<jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do not consider our measurement tools especially good at the moment, and 
> the close-polygon change did not make it much better, if any. I know that 
> there are different needs, but for what I am using length/area measurement 
> tool I would like to have these features
>
> - Length measurement tool should show the total length and the length of the 
> last leg, both in real time.
> - Area measurement tool should show the area and the perimeter of the 
> measured area in real time. Length of the last leg would be a good addition.
>
> OJ measurement tool cannot show the length of the last leg, nor the perimeter 
> of an area. It does show nice the angle of the last leg but this far I have 
> not had any use for this feature.
>
> I also notised that the measurement tool gives faulty results if snapping to 
> features is enabled.  The measument tool is obviously using the mouse 
> coordinates for calculations, but it does not update the coordinates if 
> vertex gets snapped to something after mouse click.  This is easy to 
> demonstrate by showing the grid and activating the "Snap to grid" option and 
> then measuring areas of some rectangular areas.
>
> I have been thinking that as an alternative for the ad-hoc measurement tool 
> there could perhaps be another measurement tool would create automatically a 
> special measurement layer somehow in a similar way than the note tool creates 
> the "Notes" layer now.  This way it could be possible to measure net areas 
> and total perimeters of polygons with holes, measure several features, edit 
> the measurements, show the results on screen as labels or under the tooltip 
> etc.
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
> Matthias Scholz wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>
>>I agree you from your point of view (measure of lines), but my point of
> view was for measure of areas. So i think the measurement tool should be
> extended in the future. If I compare the OJ measure tool with other GIS,
> then I see some mistakes and possibilities to improve OJ.
>
>> Matthias
>
>>> mhm.. don't know after testing (It's still committed) - but now people
>> who want to measure line distance may be confused?
>>>
>>> any opinions by others?
>>>
>>> stefan
>>>
>>> Stefan Steiniger wrote:
>>
>>>> Hei,
>>>
>>>> what would be the effect for you (area calculations?)? Will everything
>>> else still work?
>>>
>>>> However, I committed it.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Matthias Scholz wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> is it possible, that anyone of the commiters can make the following
>>>> little change in
>>>> com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.cursortool.MeasureTool?
>>>> Add "setCloseRing(true);" to the Constructor, so that the user see the
>>>> closed polygon. Currently, some users of mine a little confused.
>>>>
>>>> Thank You
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to