if the current geotools (just checked they are 2.5.5 stable now) shapefile reader/writer is more advanced why not aiming on using it .. i once wrote a geotools reader/writer extension, that should be possible these days as well ... only problem was that I had to convert the data structure because it was different those days, so I ended up loading the file and converting the whole collection, which of course wasted memory and computing power. but hey, it worked.
generally jump should target on using more geotools power (did i mention that before? :)). ...ede > > Michaël Michaud wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As I tried to fix a bug in PolygonHandler (see end of e-mail), I noticed >> some other strange pieces of code in this class. >> >> >> > The ShapefileReader code is really horrific, IMHO. We grabbed it from > an early release of GeoTools, and never upgraded it since it (more or > less) worked. At this point it's probably best not to upgrade, since it > has been enhanced (eg adding date support) and pretty well tested. But > no doubt there's lots of improvements that could be made. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
