well.. can you share what was questioning it?
Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Thanks for the comments guys. I'll leave it in my plug-in for now. > After some thought, I may move the methods to a utility class in one > of the packages mentioned. > > Some recent things I read have me questioning the use of static > utility methods. I have decided against them completely just yet, but > I'm trying not to use them as much as I did before. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
