+1 sounds reasonable (alhough I never needed something like this for my experimental stuff)
Andreas Schmitz schrieb: > Paul Austin wrote: > > Hi, > >> At the moment there is not a good way to find the Task which owns a >> Layerable or Category. The only way I can see this is you have to find >> all the tasks in the workbench and then see which one the layer is in. >> What might be nice is if we add a reference from the LayerManager to the >> Task. You can then find the Task for a Layerable or Category via the >> LayerManager which it has a reference to? > > +1, I think I also missed this a time or two. > > Best regards, Andreas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
