I have a hunch that you may need to take a closer look to your
exception architecture. It's something that's often neglected in Java
design.  IMHO general having try/catch in tight computation code is
not a good sign.  There are many, many articles on the net on
designing a good exception system. In particular know the difference
between checked and unchecked exceptions.

Joe.

On Jan 30, 2008 11:23 AM, P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may be wrong, and I'm too lazy to actually test it,
> but I think the last "return null" is indeed reached.
>
> The catch kind of "kills" the exception, it eats it up,
> so, with the exception gone, execution resumes right after
> the catch block, and the "return null" _is_ reached.
>
> That's why the compiler complains if you remove it.
>
> Bye
> Paolo Rizzi
>
>
> > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
> > Sunburned Surveyor
> > Inviato: martedì 29 gennaio 2008 21.20
> > A: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
> > Oggetto: [JPP-Devel] [Off-Topic] Return values in Java methods with
> > atry/catch statements.
> >
> >
> > I've got a quick question about the best way to handle return values
> > in Java methods with a try/catch statement. Consider, as an example,
> > the following method:
> >
> > public static SurveyorsAngle
> > getSupplementaryAngle(SurveyorsAngle argAngle)
> > {
> >    try
> >    {
> >       SurveyorsAngle halfRevolution = new BasicSurveyorsAngle(0.50);
> >       SurveyorsAngle toReturn =
> > AngleCruncher.subtractAngles(halfRevolution, argAngle);
> >       return toReturn;
> >    }
> >
> >    catch(ShouldNeverReachHere caught)
> >    {
> >        System.err.println(caught.getMessage());
> >    }
> >
> >       return null;
> > }
> >
> > In this example the return value must be set within the try statement,
> > becuase the subtractAngles method throws an exception.
> >
> > This means that the method has to return a null value after the
> > try/catch statements. However, this return statement will never be
> > reached, because the method will either [1] return from the try
> > statement with a valid SurveyorsAngle object or [2] execution will
> > shift to the catch statement.
> >
> > However, if I remove the return null statement from the end of this
> > method, Eclipse gives me a compile error. This error states that the
> > getSupplementaryAngle method must return a SurveyorsAngle value.
> >
> > I seem to run into this a lot in my code. I know I could just
> > eiliminate the try/catch statement and add a throws clause to the
> > containing method, but sometimes the exception SHOULD be handled in
> > the containing method.
> >
> > Is there a better solution? It seems like the compiler is requiring a
> > return statement that can never be reached.
> >
> > Thanks for any advice on this.
> >
> > The Sunburned Surveyor
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to