Paul Austin wrote: Hi,
> I was thinking that we could clean up this code a little, at the moment > there is hard coded implementations for layers and WMS layers. We could > change this to use a factory approach by creating implementations for these. > > There are actually a whole bunch of places we could do this including > the tree view panel. > > Any objections if I gradually move over to using a factory based approach? I don't see the advantage here. If you use a factory, you'll choose the implementation you want from the factory. If you don't, you'll just choose the implementation. Eg: WMSLayer layer = new WMSLayer(blah, blubb); vs WMSLayer layer = LayerFactory.createWMSLayer(blah, blubb); Best regards, Andreas -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-11 fax ++49 +228 1849629 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
