Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Yes, this is a feature I missed sometimes.
> That makes me remember that trying to copy/paste geometry from an 
> existing layer to the fence,
> I get strange things like having 2 geometries in the fence layer.
> (I know I have to reproduce it to be able to fill a bug report).
>   
Yes, I don't think this concept was every really tested out, either from 
a design or code correctness point of view.  Seems like it would be 
worth doing.  I've always liked the Fence concept as a way of specifying 
an arbitrary area of interest.
> Michaël
>
>   
>> Larry Becker wrote:
>>  
>>
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  Recent work with Extract Layers by Geometry Type, and improving 
>>> OpenJump's support for very large selections, has convinced me that 
>>> JUMP needs a mechanism for dealing with subsets of large layers.  
>>> Although the selection mechanism is very flexible, it is very 
>>> expensive in terms of memory and processing.  To seem what I mean, 
>>> consider Arnd's million point layer problem.  To break the layer into 
>>> more manageable pieces, he tried to select some of the points and move 
>>> them to another layer.  When this is done with such a large selection, 
>>> the UI must build gigantic data structures.  The result is an 
>>> extremely slow response or an out of memory error.
>>>
>>> An approach that might work for some problems is to use the Fence tool 
>>> to indicate a subset of the data that can be used in place of a 
>>> selection.  The advantage is that no data structures are needed and 
>>> there are no selection handles to draw.  I was thinking of producing 
>>> another Layer Extract plugin that would extract features in the Fence 
>>> to a new layer.  By coding support methods in a utility class, we 
>>> could gradually add support for "features in fence" subsets to the 
>>> other tools.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Larry Becker
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>>> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>  
>>>    
>>>
>>>       
>>  
>>
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>   

-- 
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to