Yes I meant changes to the OJ core. Of course I will propose any refactoring on this list so it can be discussed. It is quite possible that some of our programmers know the code better than I do.
In fact, I saw some comments in the code from Ole and I think he even made a utility class called SelectTools. So I won't break anything without permission. :] When all is said and done I think even having Javadoc comments for all of the public methods will be a big improvement. I spent a lot of time decipehering the source code to figure out what the public methods actually do. SS On 9/11/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nice that you detailed outline your program > > > - Refactoring of some source code in the SelectTool class, the > > AbstractSelection class, and the FeatureSelection class. ( I have > > already added some source code comments to these classes.) > > which probably needs to be discussed.. > if you want to apply the changes to the OJ core. I did you mean > something else. (I actually wonder if this realy requires a refactoring) > > stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
