of course, i am/we are interested in your evaluation results.

stefan

Dr. Markus Lupp (Müller) schrieb:
> Hi Landon,
> 
> Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
>> [snip]
>>   
> 
>> I'd also like to know if the DeeJUMP team had any thoughts about
>> Paul's suggestion of tapping into the Java port of PROJ4. It seems
>> like a logical choice for projection code.
>>  
> 
> 
> When we started to include proj4 in deegree we had some problems with it
> (besides that it is a proj4 library). The problems were related to the
> precision of transformations, corrdinate axis order and naming of the
> projections. If the Java port shows the same problems, it would be good
> to be careful to include it in OJ.
> 
> Because of the mentioned problems we started to implement coordinate
> projection and transformation classes in deegree itself. The link to the
> java port that was sent over the OJ-list
> (http://www.jhlabs.com/java/maps/proj/) is very interesting for us. We
> will evaluate if the JH labs portal is a workable alternative for
> deegree. We can publish our results over the OJ list if there is interest.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Markus
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to