Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: Hei Gusieppe,
if you feel the information from the other docs is sufficient and
necessary then use it otherwise make the improvements you want.
I would also vote for a "quick - what's this for?" documentation, than
for a comprehensive documentation. If the first version one is done, we
can afterwards still extend the doc to a comprehensive guide. but at the
end it is your decision, because you better can estimate what time you
have for.
stefan
Hi Stefan,
you're probabily right. A "quick - what's this for?", which was my original
idea: a complete, simple, description of tools and functions. I have different
docs which I wrote with different "degree" of description. Then I probabily
make them simple. By the tiome that I have a complete structure of the whole
help doc, we can extend it.
The Toolbar section probabily needs a larger description, and some extra
pictures. I will se when I will be back home.
Peppe
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
