Hei, hope it is ok to send a copy on the list.
I am not sure about it, since it doubles efforts in copying and syncronizing the sources and i think nightly builts have to be somehow stable (i.e. are runnable) What would be possible is to make a new tree from the current module that contains the "stable" version. While the current cvs versions stays would be the instable one. Because i would not like to loose the nightly built. This would ensure that changes made are still one day afterwards avaliable to users. other oppinions? sorry if i missed some of the emails that dicussed that issue - simply to much are coming in at the time. stefan Sunburned Surveyor schrieb: > Stefan, > > It sounds like a couple of the developers would like to have an > unstable branch of the OpenJUMP code base that they could work in. > Would you have a problem hosting this in the OpenJUMP CVS? > > If you have reasons to avoid this I will create a copy of the OpenJUMP > code at the SurveyOS that can be used instead, but I think it would be > easier to keep the two branches in the same repository. > > Let me know what you prefer. I can let the list know about our > decision and make the changes needed. > > Thanks, > > Landon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
