I haven't used this, but it sounds interesting. It's great to have tools like this, but it doesn't remove the need to define the tests and the expected output, and to keep them in synch as the codebase changes.
I would presume that it isn't possible to define tests which have a graphical result - which might limit its applicability to applications whose main functionality is expressed as images. Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Do any of you guys have experience testing Java GUI components with > Abbot? > > http://abbot.sourceforge.net/doc/overview.shtml > > What did you think of it? Have you written any Abbot tests for > JUMP/OpenJUMP? > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > -- Martin Davis Senior Technical Architect Refractions Research, Inc. (250) 383-3022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
