Alright I'll put this on my todo list. Might not get to it for a while as
I'm not currently doing OpenJUMP stuff so my brain's not in it. Perhaps
someone else could set up a nightly build and point the wiki link to it?

Otherwise I will get to this when I can.

Jon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Steiniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:50 AM
> To: List for discussion of JPP development and use.; Petter 
> Reinholdtsen; Jonathan Aquino
> Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Please include all needed files in 
> the source package
> 
> 
> Sorry Petter,
> 
> i am not the one who is doing the nightly build. So that's 
> why i can not 
> change what you find on that repository. Jon does the nightly 
> built on 
> his home PC (and we are thankfull to him), thus he needs to 
> change the 
> script @home.
> The only src package which should contain all the necessary 
> files is the 
> downloadable release 1.0.1
> 
> @ Jon if you should do that change, do you think you can also include 
> that the jar manifest contains the information on the needed 
> libraries 
> => see Jump-User email by Larry Becker: "JUMP jar Manifest"
> 
> stefan
> 
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 
> >[Stefan Steiniger 2006-04-29]
> >  
> >
> >>sorry but to include the things is actually a question of free time 
> >>(from my side). And i am not familar with the build script. 
> but i hope 
> >>we can do the fixes soon
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >[Petter Reinholdtsen 2006-04-30]
> >  
> >
> >>OK.  Good to know that I do not need to provide more arguments, and 
> >>just need to exercise my patience. :)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >OK, so I am not a patient man.  I gave up waiting.  I had a look in 
> >openjump-src-20060801-0013.zip, the latest daily snapshot of the 
> >source, and it is still lacking the needed build rules.
> >
> >Do anyone have time to make sure the source zipfile include 
> build.xml 
> >and possibly log4j.xml and any other files needed to build 
> from source?  
> >It would increase the chance of me updating the version of 
> openjump in 
> >Debian a lot. :)
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Btw, I just noticed the 1.0.1 release, with a 
> openjump-1-0-1.zip file 
> >>to download.  If possible, please use dots instead of 
> dashes between 
> >>the digits in the version string as was done before.  It 
> will make my 
> >>file as Debian packager easier.  Dashes have special meaning in the 
> >>version string in Debian, and I would like to avoid making "my own" 
> >>version number for the package in Debian.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >This would also help a lot.
> >
> >And while someone is working on the build rule for the 
> source zip file, 
> >would it be possible to make the java files be tagged as 
> text files in 
> >the zip file, to make 'unzip -a' work as it should on unix? At the 
> >moment, all the files seem to be marked as binary, and this make it 
> >hard to extract files with correct line endings. :/
> >
> >Friendly,
> >  
> >
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to