Le mercredi 16 novembre 2016 à 13:38 +0000, FANG Colin a écrit :
> Is there going to be overhead if I create constant group modules and
> use them via module_name.abc?
Not that I know of.
Regards
> On 16 November 2016 at 13:31, Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimi...@club.fr>
> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 16 novembre 2016 à 04:18 -0800, FANG Colin a écrit :
> > > Say, I have a few constants
> > >
> > > const VTYPE_BINARY = 'B'
> > > const VTYPE_INTEGER = 'I'
> > > const VTYPE_CONTINUOUS = 'C'
> > >
> > > What's a good way to have a namespace on it?
> > >
> > > So that I can use Vtype.BINARY, Vtype.INTEGER, Vtype.CONTINUOUS
> > >
> > > Should I put those in a separator module? or create a type and
> > get an
> > > instance of it?
> > >
> > > module Vtype
> > > const ....
> > > end
> > >
> > > immutable Vtype
> > > BINARY::Char
> > > INTEGER::Char
> > > CONTINUOUS::Char
> > > end
> > >
> > > const vtype = Vtype('B','I','C')?
> > Putting it in a module is fine if you want to regroup these under
> > the
> > same namespace. That's the standard practice with enums too (when
> > constants correspond to integer codes, which isn't the case here).
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
>
